adrianshort
/
planningalerts
mirror of https://github.com/adrianshort/planningalerts.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 0 Releases 0 Wiki Activity
Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/planningalerts
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
1250 Commits
2 Branches
2.4 MiB
 
 
 
 
 
 
Tree: 21853a7aa1
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from '21853a7aa1'
${ noResults }
planningalerts/wiki/UKPlanning.wiki

18 lines
1.6 KiB
Raw Blame History 

  1. #summary A planning portal with very strict terms

  2. = Introduction =

  3. 

  4. The UKPlanning website has a large collection of applications from a range of local authorities, however they have very strict usage terms wich are copied below:

  5. 

  6. _The contents of these pages are copyright © IDOX Group PLC  2003 – 2008.

  7. 

  8. _Reproduction or data extraction of part or all of the contents in any form is prohibited unless for personal, non commercial use. None of the content of this web site may be copied or otherwise incorporated into or stored in any other web site, electronic retrieval system, publication or other work in any form (whether hard copy, electronic or other). For the avoidance of doubt, framing of this site or any part of it is not permitted without express permission of IDOX Group PLC.

  9. 

  10. = Discussion =

  11. 

  12. If such a policy did not exist this site would be a fantastic source of information, they seem like a very switched on technology company. I am interested in how much legal founding their statement is, surely the information is in the public domain?

  13. 

  14. I am very aware that we do not want to get involved in any form of legal wrangling with them but if we could put together a valid argument for our right to access this information then maybe they would be keen to work with us?

  15. 

  16. Does anyone know if there is a legal difference between the source of data and the copyright of data? Surely it doesn't matter who publishes something - if the information is in the public domain then anyone can copy it?

  17. 

  18. Of course there is also the question of etiquette and it would be rude to screen scrape their site when they clearly do not want people to. Basically I'm thinking out loud here.